Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoked out
projo.com ^ | 04-04-04 | JENNIFER LEVITZ

Posted on 04/05/2004 8:16:18 AM PDT by SheLion

Smoked out

Some companies now forbid workers to smoke anywhere on their property -- not on the sidewalk, not even in their cars in the parking lot.

01:00 AM EST on Sunday, April 4, 2004

BY JENNIFER LEVITZ
Journal Staff Writer

Everyone knows you can't smoke in the office anymore.

But increasingly, you can't smoke outside work either.

At Rhode Island Hospital, employees have a nickname for their designated outdoor smoking kiosks: butt huts.

The workers, however, could consider themselves indulged that they're allowed to puff on the hospital's sprawling property at all.

Because a few miles away at Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse, in Cranston, employees who want a cigarette must punch out, get in their cars, and drive off store grounds. Workers who sneak a smoke in their cars in the Lowe's parking lot can be disciplined under a corporate policy that went into effect in September. Workers at Beacon Mutual Insurance Co., in Warwick, also aren't allowed to smoke in their cars in the parking lot, or it could lead to a note in their personnel file.

Molly Clark, director of environmental health programs at the American Lung Association of Rhode Island, says the smoke-ban trend is "regulating outdoors as well" as indoors.

Companies send smokers outside, she said, only to find them huddled by the front doors in a cloud of stale smoke.

But the outdoor restrictions aren't only about secondhand smoke and unwelcoming whiffs at the front door.

Some employers, believing that smokers drive up health-care costs, are unabashedly trying to get them to quit. Companies might run into legal problems if they refuse to hire smokers, but they can make it a hassle to be one.

When toymaker Hasbro Inc. created a designated outdoor smoking area last year, "we tried to make it as inconvenient as possible," said Robert Carniaux, senior vice president of human resources. "We were hoping that we might effect some change in behavior."

CHER SILVIA wishes people would stop minding her behavior.

That behavior has included dragging on Dorals for 24 years.

In December, Silvia started RI Rights, an online activism group for Rhode Island smokers, who don't want to see the state go the way of New York and other smoke-free places. Silvia, of Tiverton, is retired and lives in Lake Placid, Fla., but she comes north for the summer.

If Rhode Island starts enacting bans all over, she said last week in a friendly, husky voice, "I can't take it."

She said employers who tell workers they can't smoke in their cars -- or on the property -- have gone too far.

"They're nannies," she said. "They've got to tell us what's best for us. I don't appreciate it at all. I can live my own life the way I want to."

Such workplace bans are ahead of what is required by Rhode Island law. Rhode Island's smoking laws, which have lagged behind those in border states, don't ban smoking in workplaces.

But that may change.

On Thursday, the House leadership introduced legislation that would ban smoking in virtually every public place, including restaurants, shopping malls and private office buildings. The bill would also require that employers who allow their workers to smoke outside "must provide an area which is physically separated from the enclosed workplace so as to prevent the migration of smoke into the workplace."

The bill sponsored by House Majority Leader Gordon D. Fox represents more than six months of negotiations and marks a reversal for the House, which last year allowed similar legislation passed by the Senate to die.

Rep. Elizabeth M. Dennigan, D-East Providence, has been a leader on the smoke-ban issue during her eight years in the House.

"We certainly have more support this year. I think a lot of that has to do with what has happened regionally since we adjourned last year," Dennigan said, referring to New York and the sweeping smoking laws that have passed in Connecticut. Legislation in Massachusetts has passed the House and Senate, and the governor has promised not to veto it.

REGARDLESS of what's happening at the General Assembly, a nonprofit agency called the Worksite Wellness Council of Rhode Island is working with Rhode Island companies to change smoking policies.

The council is an affiliate of the Worksite Wellness Council of America, a national organization started in 1982 by some workers in Omaha, Neb.

The original mission was to "enhance the health and well-being of employees," thereby helping companies save money and time, according to the national council's Web site. The Omaha council's success spurred "cost-conscious" employers in other communities to form their own councils. Rhode Island's Department of Health helped local companies start the wellness council here in 1999.

The Worksite Wellness Council of Rhode Island is now its own nonprofit organization with 150 members. Jeffrey Johnson, vice president of community relations at Beacon Mutual Insurance, is president.

He said the wellness council has used Health Department statistics to "find out what is killing" Rhode Islanders.

"We've tried to take the top five things and try to find grant money and go out and make a critical difference in the workplace," he said.

He said that if employers spend money and time on their workers' health, they can "reduce health-care costs, workers' comp costs," absenteeism -- and boost productivity.

For each of four years now, the local wellness council has received a $50,000 grant from the state's share of federal tobacco money. As part of the $246-billion tobacco settlement of 1998, tobacco companies make annual payments to states.

The wellness council uses the tobacco grant money to send Debra Foley, a consultant, to workplaces. Foley said it is her job to assist employers in achieving a smoke-free status.

Foley has worked with some 175 companies over the past four years.

The majority do have some restrictions on where smoking is allowed outside building, she said.

She knows of 8 or 10 companies that have entirely smoke-free premises. And more are considering it.

"In the last month I have had four companies referred to me that are interested in going to a smoke-free campus," she said.

Policies are the most effective way to encourage smokers to quit smoking, she said.

DR. RICHARD BROWN, director of addictions research at Butler Hospital and Brown University, found it interesting that some companies are enforcing policies as a way not only to keep the air cleaner, but to change habits.

"My personal reaction is that it's a little more controversial," he said.

People tend to not like to have behaviors dictated to them, he said.

He said those workplace smoking policies, however, could be positive if the strict rules are paired with education and support for the smokers. Hasbro, Beacon Mutual, Lowe's and other companies said they did phase in their smoking policies and have offered to help employees quit with smoking cessation-classes and health fairs. Hasbro even brought in a hypnotist.

Beacon Mutual started educating and warning its smokers long before the company moved 2 1/2 years ago from rented offices to its privately owned headquarters overlooking Route 95 in Warwick. As a tenant, it could not stop employees from puffing in the hallways; as owner of its headquarters, it could.

"We told them a year before we moved that there would be no smoking on the grounds," said Johnson, the vice president of community relations.

And that there would be no smoking in the parking lot.

Some employees said, but it's my car. The company told them that they were on private property. "A couple of people did get caught," Johnson said, but it never went beyond a verbal warning. However, future offenses could result in a written warning that would become part of their personnel file.

Once in the new building, the company also banned the informal practice of smoking breaks.

"The rest of the people were saying, 'How come smokers get a break and go outside and we don't?' " Johnson said.

"We said, 'You're absolutely right. That's not fair, because we're rewarding bad behavior.' That's when we said to supervisors, you've got to stay on top of it and make sure smokers are not allowed to take breaks."

MOST OF THE NEW hires come with the understanding that they will have to go until lunchtime without a cigarette. Johnson said Beacon is doing its employees a favor.

"We can't afford to do all these self-destructive behaviors, and people are finally waking up to that fact," he said.

Down in Florida, Cher Silvia, founder of RI Rights, has been collecting data on workplace smoking bans.

Along with running RI Rights, Silvia is a member of Illinois Smokers, Florida Smokers, Florida Rights, Maine Rights, the Smokers Club forum, and more.

"This morning, I opened up 100 e-mails," she said last week. "That's just in the morning. God knows what I get in the day."

One of the big topics for the Internet groups lately is Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse and its national policy that forbids employees to smoke anywhere on the premises, including in their own cars in the parking lot.

But Lowe's national spokeswoman, Chris Ahearn, said the new policy has worked very well.

She said there have been complaints but just as many comments from employees who like working in a smoke-free environment.

"We're not telling people to stop smoking," Ahearn said. "We're saying don't smoke on our property."

With staff reports by Scott Mayerowitz

DIGITAL EXTRA: To smoke -- in public -- or not to smoke? Cast your vote on the topic at:

http://projo.com/news/smokingpoll.htm


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Rhode Island
KEYWORDS: addiction; antismokers; bans; butts; chimneypeople; cigarettes; drugaddicts; individualliberty; lawmakers; leatherskin; maine; nicoaddicts; niconazis; nicotineaddiction; professional; prohibitionists; propertyrights; pufflist; rottingteeth; smokingbans; stinkybreath; taxes; tobacco; worldismyashtray; yellowfingers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-288 next last
Some employees said, but it's my car. The company told them that they were on private property. "A couple of people did get caught," Johnson said...

Now, all of a sudden, it becomes PRIVATE PROPERTY.  Business owners who own a restaurant, this is PUBLIC? I don't think so!

make sure smokers are not allowed to take breaks.

Let me repeat this: MAKE SURE SMOKERS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE BREAKS.

tobacco companies make annual payments to states.

I repeat: the tobacco companies do NOT pay the states.  The SMOKERS who pay TAXES on cigarettes are paying that money into the states!  The SMOKERS! Not big Tobacco and surely, not the state governments.  THE SMOKERS!

1 posted on 04/05/2004 8:16:18 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; steve50; KS Flyover; ...

2 posted on 04/05/2004 8:16:48 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Daood! Don't be a fuddy duddy.

Donate to FR

Mail a check to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC


3 posted on 04/05/2004 8:17:45 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (If Woody had gone straight to the police, this would never have happened!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
One of the most sickening articles I have read in a long time.

Please! Take the poll!!!

4 posted on 04/05/2004 8:19:28 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Of course, this isn't really about smoking. It's about control.
5 posted on 04/05/2004 8:19:35 AM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

This poll is in bad need of freeping.


6 posted on 04/05/2004 8:25:07 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
Of course, this isn't really about smoking. It's about control.


7 posted on 04/05/2004 8:25:38 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
If only the smokers would be more polite and try to reach a middle ground. If only they would compromise with the non smokers. (Sarcastic gnatzie tone)
8 posted on 04/05/2004 8:25:43 AM PDT by CSM (Vote Kerry! Boil the Frog! Speed up the 2nd Revolution! (Be like Spain! At least they're honest))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
My Florida Panhandle survey revealed that the greatest loss of business is in peak hours, when one may have to wait 45 minutes to an hour at the bar before being seated to order food. Without fail smokers leave and go elsewhere.

One of my favorite restaurants is now closed. I could not confirm it but another restaurant owner told me that the ban put them out of buisness. My favorite restaurant relied heavily on the local crowd to stay open during the off season. A lot of the off season traffic was for dinner and drinks. This allowed them to keep their key staff employed year round. The ban took the locals and snowbirds out of their customer base. Another owner told me that his business was down 20% and he expects it to be worse as the season moves along. He said that the fast food chains are booming because smokers can get their food and go.

The ban is killing the small seafood restaurant/bar owner. No on wanted their name to be used because most of them are suing the state and local governments for the loss.

9 posted on 04/05/2004 8:29:02 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (What?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
CHER SILVIA wishes people would stop minding her behavior. [...] "They're nannies," she said. "They've got to tell us what's best for us.

Welcome to America.

10 posted on 04/05/2004 8:29:57 AM PDT by Sweet Land (http://www.savingangel.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Once in the new building, the company also banned the informal practice of smoking breaks.

Put things in pespective. Non-smokers get a single 15 minute break midway between 8am and noon, and a second 15 minute break midway between 1pm and 5.

Smokers, as I have seen, take a 'smoke break' whenever the mood strikes. It is not fair that smokers get to take multiple breaks, and non-smokers must follow the rules.

Now, if smokers get the SAME treatment as non-smokers; then the only difference remains the addictive and health issues. That is a separate arguement.

11 posted on 04/05/2004 8:31:06 AM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
The ban is killing the small seafood restaurant/bar owner. No on wanted their name to be used because most of them are suing the state and local governments for the loss.

WOW! Really? I LIKE this!!!!!!!!! Thanks for the post!!!!!!

12 posted on 04/05/2004 8:32:30 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sweet Land
Welcome to America


13 posted on 04/05/2004 8:34:25 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Let me repeat this: MAKE SURE SMOKERS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE BREAKS.

I've read your posts in the past and found them generally to be fair and well sourced. However, this time, I think you are focusing on the wrong part.

In my opinion, smokers do not deserve EXTRA breaks that non smoker's wouldn't get. The article says that smokers would have to wait until lunch break to have their smoke. I don't know if the company offered their employees other breaks or not throughout the day, but all employees should get the same amount of break times.

Once in the new building, the company also banned the informal practice of smoking breaks.

"The rest of the people were saying, 'How come smokers get a break and go outside and we don't?' " Johnson said.

"We said, 'You're absolutely right. That's not fair, because we're rewarding bad behavior.' That's when we said to supervisors, you've got to stay on top of it and make sure smokers are not allowed to take breaks."

MOST OF THE NEW hires come with the understanding that they will have to go until lunchtime without a cigarette. Johnson said Beacon is doing its employees a favor.

The only thing wrong with the above is that the supervisors should have been told to make sure smokers didn't take SMOKE breaks. But, I think people understand what was meant.

14 posted on 04/05/2004 8:40:45 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny) (Isaiah 47:4 - Our Redeemer, YHWH of hosts is His name, The Holy One of Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Put things in pespective. Non-smokers get a single 15 minute break midway between 8am and noon, and a second 15 minute break midway between 1pm and 5.

When Loring Air Force Base was here, I was the SATO Travel Agent on Base.  There were two of us.  The other was a male, and he didn't smoke.  He was obese and liked to eat.  I smoked.

I could step outside for a cigarette break.  When I was busy, I never thought about having a cigarette.  Especially during the last Desert Storm, we went non-stop.  It was only when I wasn't busy, then I thought about going out for a cigarette.

The Government Employees get one 10 minute break in the morning and one 10 minute break in the afternoon, and also lunch.   Even though we worked on Base for the military, we weren't GS.  We were DOD.  

I believe if a smoker is outside constantly smoking, that is the fault of the boss, and evidentially, the employee is not busy enough.  People who smoke also have to respect their positions and not over step the breaks.  Can't they see that this is really grinding in the knife that is reason for the bans?

But to take away all smoking breaks and ban smoking on the "private property" for control of a person's behavior is just dead wrong.  How about the fatty that sits at their desk all day eating?  They have their "cake and can eat it too."  It's not the fault of the smoker that the fatty doesn't get up and move around.  They, too, could run outside with smokers and get a breath of fresh air and stretch their limbs.  This is utter BS not to mention total control of 25-30% of the employees that work in such positions.

15 posted on 04/05/2004 8:43:11 AM PDT by SheLion (Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I am completely opposed to government imposed smoking bans. However, when private companies, such as Lowe's and Hasbro, want to ban smoking on their premises, I completely support them.

It is their company, their property. No one is entitled to a job with those companies. If a person can't abide by the rules set up by the company for workplace conduct, they need to find employment elsewhere.

I don't blame companies one bit for doing whatever they can to discourage smoking. The company pays the insurance bills. They are losing productivity when people go out to smoke. It's a matter of economics.

And it's true what the article says, it's not fair to non-smokers that smokers can go out for a break every hour or so. If a non-smoker goes outside and just lingers around socializing, they'd get reprimanded for it.

16 posted on 04/05/2004 8:44:13 AM PDT by tdadams (If there were no problems, politicians would have to invent them... wait, they already do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
I'm just waiting to see what happens to all these "nonprofit organizations" that tout themselves as helping people to stop when they receive no more money due to the fact that they don't get any more money from the MSA.

I'm gonna LMAO.

17 posted on 04/05/2004 8:44:54 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Monthly donors are better lovers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
On Tuesday night we went into a place. I asked how long is the wait. The hostess said 45 minutes. I said not for me. The hostess asked, smoker? I said yes. She said we don't get many smokers that will wait anymore. I asked how many she thought she lost. She said on a busy night 40% of their buisness walked out the door.

She said she was a smoker too and hates the ban. She whispered that non-smokers usually tip less and demand more. I told her we'd comeback sometime when the crowd was smaller.
18 posted on 04/05/2004 8:46:59 AM PDT by Conspiracy Guy (What?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
I think by banning smoking on 'private property' they may be be able to lessen the cost of their fire insurance. (just a thought) It may not be all about 'control', but a way to lessen their expenses and better protect their investment. A 2fer.
19 posted on 04/05/2004 8:47:34 AM PDT by ET(end tyranny) (Isaiah 47:4 - Our Redeemer, YHWH of hosts is His name, The Holy One of Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ET(end tyranny)
The only thing wrong with the above is that the supervisors should have been told to make sure smokers didn't take SMOKE breaks. But, I think people understand what was meant.

I don't think YOU UNDERSTAND. Last I checked, unless the law has changed, workers are allowed, in fact mandated, to take one morning and one afternoon break. Whether they chose to take it inside or outside of the building should be their choice. Anything otherwise is akin to locking down a workplace, and not allowing workers out.

In most workplaces, even non-smokers will step outside on breaks, to take walks or just enjoy the outdoors.

20 posted on 04/05/2004 8:47:58 AM PDT by LisaMalia (In Memory of Sgt. James W. Lunsford..KIA 11-29-69 Binh Dinh S. Vietnam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-288 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson